Edinburgh Assurance Co. v. R. L. Burns Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \parties engaged in the London insurance market\ did not consider the clause to be \a contractual agreement for choice of United States law\
• “parties engaged in the London insurance market” did not consider the clause to be “a contractual agreement for choice of United States law”
• \The market sometimes recognizes both a lead underwriter at Lloyd's and a lead company underwriter.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).