Edgewood Manor Apartment Homes, LLC v. RSUI Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Declaratory Judgment Act does not “modif[y] the prudential-standing rule prohibiting litigants from asserting the rights of others”
• holding that, even if such an indirect interest “may be sufficient to establish constitutional standing,” the plaintiff “plainly lack[ed] standing under the prudential rule that a litigant cannot sue to enforce the legal rights of another”
• affirming dismissal of a plaintiff from an action brought under the Declaratory Judgment Act for lack of standing
• “a Rule 59(e) motion is not a fresh opportunity to present evidence that could have been presented earlier”
• examining difference between constitutional and prudential standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).