Edge Petroleum Operating Co. v. GPR Holdings, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that bankruptcy courts may not exercise supplemental jurisdiction and upholding a denial of mandatory abstention because the district court could have exercised supplemental jurisdiction over the non-core proceeding
• holding that court had related-to jurisdiction over a dispute between two non-debtor parties when, depending on the outcome, either the defendant or the debtors owed money to the plaintiff
• holding that the bankruptcy stay does not apply to non-debtors
• stating that § 362(a) “does not apply, however, to actions not directed against the debtor or property of the debtor”
• finding that removal within 90 days “of the order for relief stemming from [petitioner’s] bankruptcy petition was timely”
• finding that removal within 90 days “of the order for relief stemming from [petitioner’s] bankruptcy petition was timely”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).