Edgar v. Disability Reinsurance Management Services Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, in an ERISA denial of benefits case, “[t]his court does not pretend to have the right, much less the ability, to decide a controversy based upon unsworn opinions and unseen, uncross-examined witnesses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).