Edgar Allen Harrell, Cross-Appellee v. Dixon Bay Transportation Company, Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an order that set aside part of the original judgment “resulted in the entry of a new judgment,” which permitted the party aggrieved by the change to file a new motion to amend the judgment under Rule 59(e)
• granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict resulted in “entry of a new judgment . . . from which the time for filing a notice of appeal commenced to run anew”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).