Ederheimer-Stein Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no error in allowing jury unlimited access to audiotapes of a drug buy and a playback machine during deliberations
• admitting both audiotape of drug transaction and transcript thereof because the evidence was not testimonial
• rejecting \a blanket prohibition against juror access to audio tapes and playback equipment\
• trial court has discretion to allow jury to have unlimited access to tape recordings or require the jury to request to replay any recordings to prevent undue influence
• “The tapes . . . were contemporaneous recordings of drug transactions.”
• “The trial court’s decision to allow the jury unlimited access to [audio body wire tapes of a drug transaction] with playback equipment was not an abuse of discretion and, thus, we affirm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).