Edenfield v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The lack of personal service invalidated the legal force and effect of the subpoena; therefore, the subpoena could not serve as the basis for a conviction as a defaulting witness.”
• “The lack of personal service invalidated the legal force and effect of the subpoena; therefore, the subpoena could not serve as the basis for a conviction as a defaulting witness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• King v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-11-21· cited 14×
• Mijajlovic v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-06-25· cited 2×
• APOIAN v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-01-30· cited 1×
• Bradley Grandquest v. State of Alabama
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2023-03-24

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Heard v. Hopper
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1975-02-04· cited 14×