Eddings v. Department of Labor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiffs, who previously had full-time employment, were entitled to unemployment insurance where they were offered day-to-day substitute teaching positions at a 40% reduction in pay
• plaintiffs, who previously had full-time employment, were entitled to unemployment insurance where they were offered day-to-day substitute teaching positions at a 40% reduction in pay
• uncertain employment status coupled with 40% pay reduction was sufficient to satisfy good cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).