Eddie Ray Jackson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the Board failed to prove an attorney’s conduct violated this rule when it would be speculative to conclude the attorney’s actions were solely for his convenience or for an unreasonable purpose
• stating ignoring deadlines, which results in default notices from clerk, constitutes conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice
• considering the respondent’s cooperation with the Board as a factor in favor of a less severe sanction
• refusing to consider personal illness as a mitigating factor when it was not shown to have affected the attorney’s fitness to practice law
• considering the respondent’s cooperation with the Board as a factor in favor of a less severe sanction
• noting also he cooperated with the Board, had no prior ethics complaints, and was winding down his law practice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).