· 6/11/1979
Eddie David Cox v. United States Department of Justice
Citations
- 601 F.2d 1
- 195 U.S. App. D.C. 189
- 5 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1663
- 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 14112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “[e]ligibility [for a fees award in Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 552, et seq., litigation] . . . does not mean entitlement”
- indicating that the question is as yet undecided in the Fifth Circuit
- factors to be weighed in determining whether a plaintiff who has “substantially prevailed” is entitled to attorney’s fees
- factors to be weighed in determining whether a plaintiff who has \substantially prevailed\ is entitled to attorney's fees
- exemption 2 protects material of interest to federal personnel, but of no interest to the public
- “[A]n allegedly prevailing complainant must assert something more than post hoc, ergo propter hoc.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright, MacKin-non, Robb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.