Skip to main content
· 6/11/1979

Eddie David Cox v. United States Department of Justice

Citations

  • 601 F.2d 1
  • 195 U.S. App. D.C. 189
  • 5 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1663
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 14112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “[e]ligibility [for a fees award in Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 552, et seq., litigation] . . . does not mean entitlement”
  • indicating that the question is as yet undecided in the Fifth Circuit
  • factors to be weighed in determining whether a plaintiff who has “substantially prevailed” is entitled to attorney’s fees
  • factors to be weighed in determining whether a plaintiff who has \substantially prevailed\ is entitled to attorney's fees
  • exemption 2 protects material of interest to federal personnel, but of no interest to the public
  • “[A]n allegedly prevailing complainant must assert something more than post hoc, ergo propter hoc.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, MacKin-non, Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.