Eddie Brown v. April Megg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board is not authorized to address challenges to patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. §101 in an IPR proceeding: “Congress ex- pressly limited the scope of inter parties review to a subset of grounds that can be raised under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 & 103.”
• “Congress expressly limited the scope of inter partes review to a subset of grounds that can be raised under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 & 103.”
• “Evidence of industry skepticism is a question of fact that weighs in favor of non-obviousness.”
• discussing Lilly's response to adverse clinical data

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).