Ed Udey v. D.C. Kastner, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the First Amendment not to require providing an inmate with a diet consistent with his religious beliefs
• noting likelihood that if one dietary request is granted similar demands will proliferate
• “[inadequate resources can never be an adequate justification for depriving any person of his constitutional rights.” (quoting Smith v. Sullivan, 553 F.2d 373, 378 (5th Cir. 1977)); Scott v. Plante, 691 F.2d 634, 637 (3rd Cir. 1982

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).