Ed Houser Enterprises, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “Congress was really trying to reach border-line antitrust violations” by manufacturers
• “absent facts showing coercion, discriminatory allocation [of vehicles among different dealerships] is not per se cognizable under the Act”
• verbal demands were not coercion where defendant had authority to make them under terms of valid agreement
• appeal for review of summary judgment decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).