Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. Brumfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that issues of damages were moot where the defendant did not breach its duty to defend the plaintiff
• noting we may affirm the trial court’s judgment on any basis supported by the record
• where insurer did not claim that allegations in underlying “complaint fell outside *** policy coverage” but, rather, claimed that “statements” from the purported insured rendered him a nonpermissive driver, insurer could not justifiably refuse to defend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).