Economopoulos v. Kolaitis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs lacked standing -5- because they “were not entitled to the immediate possession of the [property] at the time [it] allegedly [was] wrongfully converted”
• noting that a plaintiff asserting conversion must be “entitled to the immediate possession of the item alleged to have been wrongfully converted”
• indicating, in case in which the only fraud claim was constructive fraud, that had a confidential relationship existed it would have been appropriate to apply the presumption
• “[A] cause of action for 'tor-tious interference with inheritance’ is not recognized in Virginia’ ”
• refusing to extend the conversion claim to treasury bills

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).