Ecodyne Corp. v. Shah

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing a CERCLA action because the defendants did not introduce hazardous substances onto the property and also because the plaintiff alone was responsible for the disposal
• under CERCLA, a person does not dispose hazardous waste unless he or she affirmatively does something leading to its introduction into the environment
• the court, having engaged in a grammatical and structural analysis of the word “disposal” in the CERCLA context, concluded that the “provision [§ 9607(a)(2
• former owner liable only if owned the site at the time hazardous substances were introduced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).