EcoDisc Technology AG v. DVD Format/Logo Licensing Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply the sham litigation exception 17 where there was no reason to believe that threatened 18 claims were unreasonable
• applying Rule 9(b) to a false 27 advertising claim under Lanham Act
• “At [the 9 motion to dismiss] stage in the litigation, the Court need not conclude whether [the 10 plaintiff’s] conduct was a sham. It must decide only whether Plaintiff has properly pleaded 11 that the conduct was a sham.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).