Eco Tour Adventures, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the solicitation was for “two concession contracts to provide guided cross-country ski tours, including associated transportation and food services, in Grand Teton National Park”
• “[E]quitable relief is . . . unavailable in implied contract bid protests pursued under section 1491(a).”
• “[E]quitable relief is . . . unavailable in implied contract bid protests pursued under section 1491(a).”
• “In [enacting the ADRA], Congress . . . provided this court with a new, and independent, basis for bid protest jurisdiction[.]”
• “Although the Federal Circuit has not had occasion to rule on the issue of whether the Court of Federal Claims has authority, post- ADRA, to grant equitable relief in implied contract bid protests pursued under section 1491(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).