Eckles v. Wood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding professional and reputational risks to plaintiff insufficient to justify pseudonymity
• “[I]nterests in avoiding embarrassment, criticism, and reputational harm are not privacy interests in a matter of an especially sensitive or highly personal nature and, otherwise, are not sufficient to overcome the public interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).