· 7/5/1995
Eckles v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Citations
- 890 F. Supp. 1391
- 4 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1134
- 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3025
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9568
- 1995 WL 398542
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- other employees do not have to “bumped,” nor does a bona fide seniority system have to be disrupted, in order to accommodate an ADA plaintiff
- other employees do not have to be “bumped,” nor does a bona fide seniority system have to be disrupted, in order to accommodate an ADA plaintiff
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.