Skip to main content
· 7/5/1995

Eckles v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Citations

  • 890 F. Supp. 1391
  • 4 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1134
  • 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3025
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9568
  • 1995 WL 398542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • other employees do not have to “bumped,” nor does a bona fide seniority system have to be disrupted, in order to accommodate an ADA plaintiff
  • other employees do not have to be “bumped,” nor does a bona fide seniority system have to be disrupted, in order to accommodate an ADA plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.