Eckis v. Rohrbach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[i]n civil service cases, 21 We note that Burock fails to direct the Court to any particular portion of the record in support of his arguments. See Pa.R.A.P. 2119(c
• stating that “[i]n civil service cases, the Commission is the sole fact-finder”
• stating that “[i]n civil service cases, the Commission is the sole fact-finder”
• “Whether the actions of a civil service employee constitute just cause for removal is a question of law fully reviewable by this Court.”
• “[T]he right to bear arms is not unlimited; it may be restricted in the exercise of police power for the good order of society and protection of citizens.”
• just cause shown where an employee was terminated for bringing a handgun into his office on at least one occasion in violation of the employer’s policy prohibiting weapons in the workplace

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).