Ecker v. Potts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sovereign immunity barred the suit because “[t]he result [the plaintiff] seeks would ‘interfere with the public administration’”
• declining to distinguish cases brought 23 against state officials rather than state entities for purposes of South Lake Tahoe’s analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).