Skip to main content
· 1/2/1976

E.C.I. Corp. v. G.G.C. Co.

Citations

  • 237 N.W.2d 627
  • 306 Minn. 433
  • 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1477

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the interests of justice supported reinstatement of an appeal where the court clerk’s error led to the late filing of the appeal
  • involving issue of whether appeal began to run from the original order or as amended, corrected order
  • involving issue of whether appeal began to run from the original order or as amended, corrected order
  • evidence of contract allowable when recovery based on reasonable value of the portion of the project completed
  • the time to appeal an issue begins to run anew from a modification of a judgment when an issue sought to be raised on appeal was for some reason not appealable before the modification
  • Barrett rule not strictly applied in the interests of justice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson, Kelly, MacLaughlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.