· 1/2/1976
E.C.I. Corp. v. G.G.C. Co.
Citations
- 237 N.W.2d 627
- 306 Minn. 433
- 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1477
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the interests of justice supported reinstatement of an appeal where the court clerk’s error led to the late filing of the appeal
- involving issue of whether appeal began to run from the original order or as amended, corrected order
- involving issue of whether appeal began to run from the original order or as amended, corrected order
- evidence of contract allowable when recovery based on reasonable value of the portion of the project completed
- the time to appeal an issue begins to run anew from a modification of a judgment when an issue sought to be raised on appeal was for some reason not appealable before the modification
- Barrett rule not strictly applied in the interests of justice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peterson, Kelly, MacLaughlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.