Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 4/25/2000
Echols v. State
Citations
- 759 So. 2d 495
- 2000 WL 471531
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that defense counsel’s remarks during the opening statement and a subsequent lack of supporting evidence “invited the State’s remarks in the closing argument”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: En Banc
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Denham v. Holmes ex rel. HolmesMississippi Supreme Court· 2011-04-07· cited 29×
- McClendon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2002-08-06· cited 18×
- Chatman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2006-07-25· cited 2×
- Nelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2009-09-15· cited 1×
- Gary McClendon v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2000-11-16
- Paula Denham v. Adam HolmesMississippi Supreme Court· 2008-07-28
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2009-11-17
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McClain v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1993-10-07· cited 941×
- Wells v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-06-12· cited 274×
- Gavin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-07-31· cited 194×
- Davis v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1988-08-17· cited 180×
- Ormond v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-04-15· cited 162×
- Franklin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1996-06-20· cited 113×
- Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1995-11-16· cited 71×
- Alexander v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-06-10· cited 44×
- Watson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-09-24· cited 22×
- Shipp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 1999-09-21· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.