Skip to main content
· 8/29/2003

Echo Drain v. Newsted

Citations

  • 307 F. Supp. 2d 1116
  • 68 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1203
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25253
  • 2003 WL 22074880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “even if [plaintiff] was able to prove that it had a protectable trademark, its rights in that mark would not extend beyond the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas area”
  • “Absent a clear and unambiguous ruling from a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, statements by laypersons that purport to interpret the meaning of a statute or regulation are opinion statements, and not statements of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.