Skip to main content
· 9/3/1992

Echavarria v. State

Citations

  • 839 P.2d 589
  • 108 Nev. 734
  • 1992 Nev. LEXIS 145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that robbery includes acts taken in attempting to escape for purposes of felony murder
  • concluding that the district court did not err when it refused the defendant’s proposed instruction but offered another instruction which incorporated the substance of the defendant’s proposed deadly-weapon-enhancement instruction
  • concluding that the district court did not err when it refused the defendant's proposed instruction but offered another instruction which incorporated the substance of the defendant's proposed deadly-weapon-enhancement instruction
  • holding allocution is not intended to provide a defendant with an opportunity to introduce unsworn, self-serving statements of his innocence as an alternative to taking the stand
  • holding allocution is not intended to provide a defendant with an opportunity to introduce unsworn, self-serving statements of his innocence as an alternative to taking the stand
  • recognizing \that a jury verdict of guilty may render harmless an error in the grand jury proceedings\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.