E.C. Waste, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding suspicious timing and \myriad violations of § 8(a)(1)\ was substantial evidence supporting Board's finding of animus
• holding suspicious timing and “myriad violations of § 8(a)(1)” was substantial evidence sup- porting Board’s finding of animus
• “[A]n employer’s shifting explanations for discharging an employee may themselves serve either to ground or to reinforce a finding of pretext.”
• “To determine motive, the Board may 2762 HEALTHCARE EMPLOYEES UNION v. NLRB rely on indirect evidence and inferences reasonably drawn from the totality of the circumstances.”
• \[T]he probative value of the timing of the Company's action — firing [an employee] in the critical interval between the time that the Union filed its petition for recognition and the planned representation election — is obvious.\
• \[T]he probative value of the timing of the Company's action — firing [an employee] in the critical interval between the time that the Union filed its petition for recognition and the planned representation election — is obvious.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).