Skip to main content
· 7/29/1993

Eby v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Citations

  • 629 A.2d 176
  • 157 Pa. Commw. 10

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding claimant had necessitous and compelling reason to accept employer’s separation incentive and thus was entitled to unemployment compensation benefits
  • employer informed claimant he was in a group of employees identified for elimination and continuing work was unavailable
  • employer informed claimant he was in a group of employees identified for elimination and continuing work was unavailable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doyle, Smith, Narick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.