· 7/29/1993
Eby v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Citations
- 629 A.2d 176
- 157 Pa. Commw. 10
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding claimant had necessitous and compelling reason to accept employer’s separation incentive and thus was entitled to unemployment compensation benefits
- employer informed claimant he was in a group of employees identified for elimination and continuing work was unavailable
- employer informed claimant he was in a group of employees identified for elimination and continuing work was unavailable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Doyle, Smith, Narick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.