Eby v. Producers Co-Op, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “potentially infinite rollovers are a factor in determining if the contract at issue violates the CEA” or instead “falls under the cash forward contract exclusion”
• dismissing RICO claim where there were no allegations that the defendant knowingly engaged in directing the enterprise
• denying elevator-defendant motion to dismiss CEA claims when plaintiffs alleged that contracts allowed for unlimited rolling
• in turn quoting Berent v. Kemper Corp., 780 F. Supp. 431, 448 (E.D. Mich. 1991)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).