Eby-Brown Company, LLC v. Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection and Its Secretary, James Harsdorf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Unfair Sales Act’s price system regarding cigarette distributors did not violate the Commerce Clause
• noting that improvident decisions “should be rectified through the democratic process and not the courts”
• determining that statute, which prohibited certain tobacco wholesalers from deducting “trade discounts” from costs but permitted other wholesalers to deduct such costs, did not violate equal protection
• noting that improvident decisions “should be rectified through the democratic process and not the courts”
• refusing to analyze substantive due process claim where \[t]he bulk of the allegations set forth by Eby-Brown seek redress for the alleged unequal treatment it received as a licensed wholesaler of tobacco\
• claims of alleged unequal treatment properly analyzed under the Equal Protection Clause, not as substantive due process claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).