Ebon Foundation, Inc. v. Oatman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because of commingling of corporate and personal assets, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in issuing an injunction and appointing a receiver to protect “the interests of the parties until those assets could be sorted out by a final adjudication of the various claims”
• trial court’s discretion will not be disturbed unless it is abused or there is no evidence to support the ruling
• intervention permitted because intervenors asserted interests relating to property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).