Skip to main content
· 11/19/1992

Eberly v. PennDOT

Citations

  • 17 Pa. D. & C.4th 209
  • 1992 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • given absence of evidence as to present value, trial court was not required to calculate present value of pensions when it utilized present division method and ordered each party to retain 100 percent interest in their own pension

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.