Skip to main content
· 6/9/1853

Eberly v. Groff

Citations

  • 21 Pa. 251
  • 1853 Pa. LEXIS 111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding letter advising party of its non-compliance with previous order was not an adjudication
  • Letter which only notified a company of its failure to comply with a timetable and that its case was being referred to DER counsel for further action was not an adjudication.
  • Letter which only notified a company of its failure to comply with a timetable and that its case was being referred to DER counsel for further action was not an adjudication.
  • letter which only notified a company of its failure to comply with a timetable and that its case was being referred to DER counsel for further action was not an adjudication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woodward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.