· 6/9/1853
Eberly v. Groff
Citations
- 21 Pa. 251
- 1853 Pa. LEXIS 111
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding letter advising party of its non-compliance with previous order was not an adjudication
- Letter which only notified a company of its failure to comply with a timetable and that its case was being referred to DER counsel for further action was not an adjudication.
- Letter which only notified a company of its failure to comply with a timetable and that its case was being referred to DER counsel for further action was not an adjudication.
- letter which only notified a company of its failure to comply with a timetable and that its case was being referred to DER counsel for further action was not an adjudication
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Woodward
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.