Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 11/7/1921

Eberlein v. United States

Citations

  • 257 U.S. 82
  • 42 S. Ct. 12
  • 66 L. Ed. 140
  • 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1317
  • 57 Ct. Cl. 590

Syllabus

<p>E, having been removed by the Secretary of the Treasury from a place in the customs service after due hearing upon charges, was later reinstated by the same authority, pursuant to an order of the President based on further investigation and findings that the charges were not just.</p> <p>Held: (1) That the removal was an act of discretion not subject to revision by the court. P. 84.</p> <p>(2) That the power of appointment and removal in the case was constitutionally lodged in. the Secretary of the Treasury; the President’s order could not and was not intended to operate as a reinstatement, but merely restored E’s eligibility to appointment. P. 84.</p> <p>(3) E had no claim , to the salary between the dates of his removal and his reinstatement by the Secretary.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \It is settled that in such cases the action of executive officers is not subject to revision in the courts.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Day

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases named Eberlein v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.