Eberle Design, Inc. v. RENO a & E

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an attorney who billed 9.2 hours to a case over a period of 9 days for drafting voir dire questions did not play a “substantial” role in the former client’s representation
• discussing Ethical Rule 1.10(d) in the context of a lawyer “joining” a law firm
• “By its terms, [Ethical Rule 1.10(d) ] applies only when the lawyer joining the new firm is personally disqualified under [Ethical Rule] 1.9.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).