Eberhardt v. UNIGARD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where plaintiff insurer was obligated to defend the tort actions against its insured regardless of whether it was found to be a primary or merely an excess carrier, no such immediacy of choice was imposed upon it as to justify an action for declaratory judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).