Eberhard v. Marcu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that other courts have held that “receivers [appointed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”
• holding that under New York law only creditors who are injured by a fraudulent transfer can bring a claim
• explaining that receivers “help preserve the status quo,” “conserve the existing estate,” and “marshal the assets of the defendant” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• noting that “one of the few areas beyond dispute is that an action ‘for the recovery and possession of specific, real, or personal property is one at law’ ”
• noting that “receivership should not be used as an alternative to bankruptcy”
• tracing historical origins and eventual codification of New York law governing the avoidance of fraudulent conveyances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).