Ebel v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• examinee has no absolute right to tape-record medical examination but trial court may permit use of mechanical device to record examination to safeguard the rights of the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Edmiston v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1978-11-27· cited 21×
• Hayes v. District Court Ex Rel. City & County of Denver
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1993-06-21· cited 13×
• Ramirez v. MacAdam
  California Court of Appeal· 1993-03-04· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Caryl Richards, Inc. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1961-01-18· cited 67×
• Sharff v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1955-04-28· cited 43×
• Fairfield v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-11-03· cited 39×
• Gonzi v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1959-02-17· cited 25×
• Fred Howland Co. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-09-02· cited 23×