Ebel v. Eli Lilly and Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff claiming failure to warn through improper marketing practices must show that the marketing “reached and [a]ffected the prescribing physician”
• “Where the crux of the suit is based on a failure to adequately warn, the learned intermediary doctrine may apply to strict liability, negligence, misrepresentation, and breach of warranty claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).