· 12/1/2005
E.B. v. New York City Board of Education
Citations
- 233 F.R.D. 289
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35898
- 2005 WL 3263888
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the proposed alternative methods of service did not “offend Honduran law because such methods [were] not expressly prohibited by Honduran law
- permitting service via FedEx and by hand-delivery to the defendant’s attorneys in the United States
- alternate service upon foreign corporate defendant by hand delivery to corporation’s attorneys in the United States
- “Rule 4(f)(3) allows this Court to authorize any particular method of service of its own choosing, so long as the order does not contradict any applicable international agreement”
- authorizing service via e-mail and public announcement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.