Skip to main content
· 12/1/2005

E.B. v. New York City Board of Education

Citations

  • 233 F.R.D. 289
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35898
  • 2005 WL 3263888

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the proposed alternative methods of service did not “offend Honduran law because such methods [were] not expressly prohibited by Honduran law
  • permitting service via FedEx and by hand-delivery to the defendant’s attorneys in the United States
  • alternate service upon foreign corporate defendant by hand delivery to corporation’s attorneys in the United States
  • “Rule 4(f)(3) allows this Court to authorize any particular method of service of its own choosing, so long as the order does not contradict any applicable international agreement”
  • authorizing service via e-mail and public announcement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.