EB Brands Holdings, Inc. v. McGladrey, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a district court is “required to dismiss” for “lack of jurisdiction” a second or successive § 2254 petition that is filed without the appellate court’s permission
• stating that a district court is “required to dismiss” for “lack of jurisdiction” a second or successive § 2254 petition that is filed without the appellate court’s permission
• describing the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s “restrictions on second or successive applications” as a “procedural obstacle” that cannot be overcome by bringing suit under § 2241
• “AEDPA forecloses the Sawyer exception in all circumstances, including § 2254 challenges to state death sentences.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).