Eaves v. Board of Medical Examiners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute prohibiting “[k]nowingly ... engaging in ... practice harmful or detrimental to the public” gave sufficient notice to doctors, stating “[i]t would be impossible to catalog all the types of professional misconduct”
• “The State is free to deal with different professions differently without violating the equal protection guarantees_”
• no unconstitutional combination of prosecutorial and adjudicatory functions in disciplinary action when executive director of medical board signed complaint but did not otherwise advocate for or participate in decision making

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).