Skip to main content
· 12/30/1986

Eavenson v. Lewis Means, Inc.

Citations

  • 730 P.2d 464
  • 105 N.M. 161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding promissory estoppel applicable to oral promise of employment
  • proof of the elements of promissory estoppel is sufficient to avoid the statute of frauds
  • proof of the elements of promissory estoppel is sufficient to support an oral contract for employment, otherwise barred by the statute of frauds
  • despite defendant’s offer to stipulate, trial court did not err in admitting inflammatory photographs as evidence on disputed issue
  • promissory estoppel requires that promisee act reasonably in justifiable reliance on promise as made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riordan, Walters, Sosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.