Eaton v. Lewis
Citations
- 115 F. 635
- 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4957
Syllabus
<p>1. Patents — Designs—Limitation as to Subject-Matter.</p> <p>A design patent cannot be sustained on tbe ground that tbe article bas mechanical utility, but, to be valid, it must relate to a matter of ornament, and tbe design must bave an aesthetic value. A fastening for machinery belts is not an appropriate subject for such a patent.</p> <p>2. Same — Belt Fastenings.</p> <p>Tbe Eaton design patents, Nos. 30,518, 30,519, and 30,520, each for a design for belt-fastener plates, for uniting tbe ends of machinery belting, are void because tbe article is not a proper subject for a design patent.</p>
Judges: Wheeeer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Application of StevensCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1949-04-12· cited 22×
- Sodemann Heat & Power Co. v. KauffmanEighth Circuit· 1921-07-16· cited 19×
- Williams Calk Co. v. Neverslip Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania· 1905-02-14· cited 15×
- Weisgerber v. ClowneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey· 1904-07-20· cited 10×
- American Saddle Co. v. Sager Gear Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York· 1903-04-30· cited 2×
- Bradley v. EcclesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York· 1903-05-23· cited 2×
- Roberts v. BennettSecond Circuit· 1905-01-20· cited 2×
- Williams v. Syracuse & S. R. Co.N.D. New York· 1908-05-11· cited 2×
- Eaton v. LewisSecond Circuit· 1904-02-01
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Eaton v. Lewis
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.