Eaton v. Jamrog

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding courts may not grant Rule 60(b) relief absent “a motion from the affected party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kingvision Pay-Per-View Ltd. v. Lake Alice Bar
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-02-09· cited 87×
• Mitchell ex rel. bankruptcy estate of Stein v. Burt Vetterlein & Bushnell PC
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-11-24· cited 24×
• Stryker Corporation v. XL Insurance America
  W.D. Michigan· 2010-09-16· cited 7×
• Young v. U.S. Bank, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2011-06-03· cited 7×
• United States v. Certain Land Situated in Detroit
  E.D. Michigan· 2001-12-27· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Myers v. Ace Hardware, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1985-10-22· cited 237×
• Douglas E. Baker v. Larry Raulie
  Sixth Circuit· 1989-07-25· cited 179×
• Eaton v. Jamrog
  Sixth Circuit· 1993-01-29· cited 18×
• Ellis v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1988-08-22· cited 4×