Eaton v. Indiana Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the plaintiff must present enough evidence that “any differences in their treatment cannot be attributed to other variables.”
• reiterating a similarly situated employee must be comparable to a plaintiff in all “material respects”
• reiterating a similarly situated employee must be comparable to a plaintiff in all “material respects”
• explaining plaintiff “was not required to show that [comparator’s] refusal to work was identical to hers”
• explaining plaintiff provided evidence of similarly situated comparator when both employees refused work assignment from same supervisor, held same position, and shared ultimate decisionmaker
• reiterating a similarly situated employee must be comparable to a plaintiff in all “material respects”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).