· 5/29/1984
Eaton v. Engelcke Manufacturing, Inc.
Citations
- 681 P.2d 1312
- 37 Wash. App. 677
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that quantum meruit applied in quasi-contract and implied-in-fact contract cases
- affirming quantum meruit award on basis of contract implied in fact
- “A true implied contract, or contract implied in fact, does not describe a legal relationship which differs from an express contract: only the mode of proof is different.”
- evidence of time spent on project supports quantum meruit recovery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ringold, Scholfield, Johnsen, Tern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.