Skip to main content
· 5/29/1984

Eaton v. Engelcke Manufacturing, Inc.

Citations

  • 681 P.2d 1312
  • 37 Wash. App. 677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that quantum meruit applied in quasi-contract and implied-in-fact contract cases
  • affirming quantum meruit award on basis of contract implied in fact
  • “A true implied contract, or contract implied in fact, does not describe a legal relationship which differs from an express contract: only the mode of proof is different.”
  • evidence of time spent on project supports quantum meruit recovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ringold, Scholfield, Johnsen, Tern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.