Skip to main content
· 4/13/1967

Eaton Fruit Co. v. California Spray-Chemical Corp.

Citations

  • 426 P.2d 397
  • 102 Ariz. 129
  • 1967 Ariz. LEXIS 216

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court did not have jurisdiction to consider the appeal because the underlying minute entry order “was not signed by the judge and filed with the clerk of the court”
  • requiring signed writing for appeal of order denying motion for new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bernstein, McFarland, Struckmeyer, Udall, Lockwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.