Easton v. Bradford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff’s “detailed description of the treatment procedures clearly related the therapy to the accident,” and the medical bills were properly admitted into evidence
• \the trial judge properly placed the question of the necessity and reasonableness of the charges within the purview of the jury\ in light of plaintiff's testimony relating the treatment to the accident
• applying Garrett where medical bill was incurred but unpaid
• applying Garrett where medical bill was incurred but unpaid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).