Skip to main content
· 7/6/2007

Eastman v. Union Pacific Railroad

Citations

  • 493 F.3d 1151
  • 58 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 583
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 16032
  • 2007 WL 1954031

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff understood the meaning of “suit” because he listed two collection suits against him in the same petition in which he omitted a suit from which he could gain financially
  • “courts routinely, albeit at times sub silentio, infer deliberate manipulation”
  • collecting cases applying this rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry, Baldock, Marten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.